Fun with Internet RFCsIf you have read enough boring documents, and would like to read some "useful" ones once in a while, the following actual e-mail exchange might be of interest to you:-) :
Ramaprabhu Janakiraman wrote: Thanks for pointing this out to me. I think standards compatibility is always an issue. If we want to go that way, then interoperation with the wireless communications standard (RFC 1149,* with the QoS extensions described in RFC 2549) is a definitive MUST. We should also be compatible with the high-speed standards (RFCs 1216/1217). We also must make sure that our work is not subject to obsoletion soon; observing RFC 2550 may help ther. Adapting RFCs 748 and 1097 for our purpose might be worthwile as well. If we plan on making our stuff into an Internet RFC, a good description of the standards process can be found in RFC 2551. Thanks again for letting me know about
this great step forward! Thanks to a page which is currently down and Josh Simon, I received some more pointers, which I used as a base to provide a (hopefully complete) list of not-so-boring RFCs. Let's first start with some poetry:
|